3. Wherewith shall I make the atonement? David should have addressed this question to God, even as he had addressed the previous inquiry concerning the cause of the famine. The record does not state that David took this matter to the Lord, nor does it affirm that what the Gibeonites demanded and what David carried out in response was in harmony with what God would have required in order to rectify the situation.
Saul’s offense had been a gross misrepresentation of the religion of Jehovah. His attitude probably reflected that of the Israelites at large, who, even after Saul’s death, continued to show hostility to these foreigners in their midst whom they had pledged to protect. It was highly essential that the religion of God be vindicated. Precisely what God would have demanded by way of achieving this end is not revealed.
One of the chief objects of confessing faults to the ones harmed is to nullify to the greatest possible extent the evil influence of the misdeed. Men have become completely discouraged and their souls have been lost as a result of the errors of their fellow men. It is the duty of the one who has been the stumbling block to try to remove the cause of offense to the best of his ability.
Bless the inheritance. Unless the offense against the Gibeonites were removed, Israel could not hope to enjoy the blessing of the Lord. Hence if the wrong against the Gibeonites were atoned for, these people would prove to be the means of bringing back blessings to the nation of Israel.